TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

540 I.B.E.W. Credit Union vs Wright-Dunbar Area Credit Union

Credit union

540 I.B.E.W. Credit Union

Massillon, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

58of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Wright-Dunbar Area Credit Union

Dayton, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

54of 100
Below average

Metric by metric

Measure540 I.B.E.W. Credit UnionWright-Dunbar Area Credit Union
TellerScore58 (stronger)54
Capital cushion66100 (stronger)
Loan quality25 (stronger)0
Earnings55 (stronger)39
Funding & liquidity90100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage76 (stronger)14
Peer percentile19th13th
Total assets$1.5M$360K
Deposits / shares$1.3M$290K
Capital ratio11.57%18.47% (stronger)
Problem loans2.24% (stronger)24.93%
Net charge-offs-0.04% (stronger)0.00%
Return on assets0.87% (stronger)0.47%
Loans ÷ deposits70.1%42.9% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.0%0.0%
Offices12
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

540 I.B.E.W. Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (58 vs 54). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), 540 I.B.E.W. Credit Union leads on 4 and Wright-Dunbar Area Credit Union on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions