Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Achieve Financial Credit Union vs Sikorsky Financial Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Achieve Financial Credit Union | Sikorsky Financial Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 37 | 84 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 34 | 79 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 23 | 92 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 0 | 77 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 96 (stronger) | 78 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 63 | 97 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 1st | 93rd |
| Total assets | $176.0M | $1.5B |
| Deposits / shares | $161.4M | $1.3B |
| Capital ratio | 8.40% | 12.93% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 2.30% | 0.25% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 1.94% | 0.11% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | -0.85% | 1.42% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 63.9% (stronger) | 82.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 3.2% (stronger) | 4.7% |
| Offices | 3 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 36.0% | — |
Sikorsky Financial Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 37). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Achieve Financial Credit Union leads on 2 and Sikorsky Financial Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.