Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Amalgamated Bank of Chicago vs Providence Bank & Trust
Metric by metric
| Measure | Amalgamated Bank of Chicago | Providence Bank & Trust |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 68 | 81 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 64 | 65 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 78 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 65 | 85 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 45 | 64 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 92 | 98 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 49th | 91st |
| Total assets | $1.3B | $1.6B |
| Deposits / shares | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Capital ratio | 11.41% | 11.50% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.67% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.01% (stronger) | -0.00% |
| Return on assets | 1.13% | 1.64% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 73.7% (stronger) | 79.5% |
| Uninsured deposits | 52.4% | 30.1% (stronger) |
| Offices | 2 | 15 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Providence Bank & Trust has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Amalgamated Bank of Chicago leads on 2 and Providence Bank & Trust on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.