Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Amistad Bank vs Falcon International Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Amistad Bank | Falcon International Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 86 (stronger) | 85 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 84 |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 44 | 81 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 78 (stronger) | 60 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 81st | 97th |
| Total assets | $57.0M | $2.2B |
| Deposits / shares | $45.7M | $2.0B |
| Capital ratio | 15.29% (stronger) | 13.44% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.02% |
| Return on assets | 0.61% | 1.53% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 80.7% | 73.7% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 16.3% (stronger) | 39.4% |
| Offices | 1 | 18 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 23.7% |
Amistad Bank has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 85). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Amistad Bank leads on 5 and Falcon International Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.