Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Apple Federal Credit Union vs Lee Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Lee Federal Credit Union
Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Apple Federal Credit Union | Lee Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 76 | 99 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 59 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 81 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 76 | 95 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 90 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 93 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 79th | 99th |
| Total assets | $5.7B | $5.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $4.8B | $2.7M |
| Capital ratio | 10.93% | 50.68% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.56% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.55% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.40% | 1.86% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 69.9% | 44.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.2% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 15 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 33.0% | — |
Lee Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 76). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Apple Federal Credit Union leads on 0 and Lee Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.