TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Armed Forces Bank, National Association vs Abbott Laboratories Credit Union

Bank

Armed Forces Bank, National Association

Fort Leavenworth, Kansas · $1 billion – $10 billion

83of 100
Strong

Credit union

Abbott Laboratories Credit Union

Gurnee, Illinois · $1 billion – $10 billion

89of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureArmed Forces Bank, National AssociationAbbott Laboratories Credit Union
TellerScore8389 (stronger)
Capital cushion8995 (stronger)
Loan quality6096 (stronger)
Earnings88 (stronger)58
Funding & liquidity9898
Problem-loan coverage9199 (stronger)
Peer percentile94th97th
Total assets$1.4B$1.1B
Deposits / shares$1.2B$981.6M
Capital ratio13.92%14.49% (stronger)
Problem loans1.21%0.11% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.39%0.16% (stronger)
Return on assets1.70% (stronger)0.95%
Loans ÷ deposits59.3% (stronger)62.6%
Uninsured deposits17.1%0.0% (stronger)
Offices1411
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)20.4%—

Abbott Laboratories Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 83). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Armed Forces Bank, National Association leads on 2 and Abbott Laboratories Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions