TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Armed Forces Bank, National Association vs Citizens Bank of the Midwest

Bank

Armed Forces Bank, National Association

Fort Leavenworth, Kansas · $1 billion – $10 billion

83of 100
Strong

Bank

Citizens Bank of the Midwest

Rolla, Missouri · $100 million – $1 billion

55of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureArmed Forces Bank, National AssociationCitizens Bank of the Midwest
TellerScore83 (stronger)55
Capital cushion89 (stronger)34
Loan quality6089 (stronger)
Earnings88 (stronger)61
Funding & liquidity98 (stronger)56
Problem-loan coverage91 (stronger)24
Peer percentile94th11th
Total assets$1.4B$238.3M
Deposits / shares$1.2B$191.6M
Capital ratio13.92% (stronger)8.39%
Problem loans1.21%0.33% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.39%-0.04% (stronger)
Return on assets1.70% (stronger)1.03%
Loans ÷ deposits59.3% (stronger)85.5%
Uninsured deposits17.1% (stronger)31.7%
Offices143
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)20.4%—

Armed Forces Bank, National Association has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 55). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Armed Forces Bank, National Association leads on 5 and Citizens Bank of the Midwest on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions