TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Armed Forces Bank, National Association vs Heritage Bank

Bank

Armed Forces Bank, National Association

Fort Leavenworth, Kansas · $1 billion – $10 billion

83of 100
Strong

Bank

Heritage Bank

Olympia, Washington · $1 billion – $10 billion

68of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureArmed Forces Bank, National AssociationHeritage Bank
TellerScore83 (stronger)68
Capital cushion89 (stronger)52
Loan quality6091 (stronger)
Earnings88 (stronger)62
Funding & liquidity98 (stronger)52
Problem-loan coverage9197 (stronger)
Peer percentile94th49th
Total assets$1.4B$8.4B
Deposits / shares$1.2B$7.0B
Capital ratio13.92% (stronger)10.23%
Problem loans1.21%0.27% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.39%0.03% (stronger)
Return on assets1.70% (stronger)1.05%
Loans ÷ deposits59.3% (stronger)80.8%
Uninsured deposits17.1% (stronger)39.1%
Offices1466
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)20.4%36.1%

Armed Forces Bank, National Association has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Armed Forces Bank, National Association leads on 5 and Heritage Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions