TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Armed Forces Bank, National Association vs North Shore Trust and Savings

Bank

Armed Forces Bank, National Association

Fort Leavenworth, Kansas · $1 billion – $10 billion

83of 100
Strong

Bank

North Shore Trust and Savings

Waukegan, Illinois · $100 million – $1 billion

74of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureArmed Forces Bank, National AssociationNorth Shore Trust and Savings
TellerScore83 (stronger)74
Capital cushion89100 (stronger)
Loan quality60 (stronger)38
Earnings88 (stronger)56
Funding & liquidity98 (stronger)97
Problem-loan coverage9192 (stronger)
Peer percentile94th57th
Total assets$1.4B$270.3M
Deposits / shares$1.2B$201.3M
Capital ratio13.92%25.24% (stronger)
Problem loans1.21% (stronger)1.87%
Net charge-offs0.39%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets1.70% (stronger)0.90%
Loans ÷ deposits59.3% (stronger)63.5%
Uninsured deposits17.1%14.9% (stronger)
Offices143
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)20.4%9.8%

Armed Forces Bank, National Association has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Armed Forces Bank, National Association leads on 4 and North Shore Trust and Savings on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions