TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Armed Forces Bank, National Association vs Sound Banking Company

Bank

Armed Forces Bank, National Association

Fort Leavenworth, Kansas · $1 billion – $10 billion

83of 100
Strong

Bank

Sound Banking Company

Lakewood, Washington · Under $100 million in assets

82of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureArmed Forces Bank, National AssociationSound Banking Company
TellerScore83 (stronger)82
Capital cushion89 (stronger)71
Loan quality60100 (stronger)
Earnings88100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity98 (stronger)39
Problem-loan coverage91100 (stronger)
Peer percentile94th70th
Total assets$1.4B$45.2M
Deposits / shares$1.2B$39.6M
Capital ratio13.92% (stronger)12.08%
Problem loans1.21%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.39%0.07% (stronger)
Return on assets1.70%2.52% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits59.3% (stronger)96.6%
Uninsured deposits17.1% (stronger)37.4%
Offices141
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)20.4%—

Armed Forces Bank, National Association has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 82). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Armed Forces Bank, National Association leads on 4 and Sound Banking Company on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions