TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Armed Forces Bank, National Association vs The Cecilian Bank

Bank

Armed Forces Bank, National Association

Fort Leavenworth, Kansas · $1 billion – $10 billion

83of 100
Strong

Bank

The Cecilian Bank

Cecilia, Kentucky · $1 billion – $10 billion

77of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureArmed Forces Bank, National AssociationThe Cecilian Bank
TellerScore83 (stronger)77
Capital cushion89 (stronger)60
Loan quality6087 (stronger)
Earnings88 (stronger)87
Funding & liquidity98 (stronger)66
Problem-loan coverage9195 (stronger)
Peer percentile94th83rd
Total assets$1.4B$1.6B
Deposits / shares$1.2B$1.3B
Capital ratio13.92% (stronger)10.99%
Problem loans1.21%0.40% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.39%0.01% (stronger)
Return on assets1.70% (stronger)1.67%
Loans ÷ deposits59.3% (stronger)79.5%
Uninsured deposits17.1% (stronger)28.6%
Offices1419
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)20.4%11.4%

Armed Forces Bank, National Association has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Armed Forces Bank, National Association leads on 5 and The Cecilian Bank on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions