TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Armed Forces Bank, National Association vs Washington State Employees Credit Union

Bank

Armed Forces Bank, National Association

Fort Leavenworth, Kansas · $1 billion – $10 billion

83of 100
Strong

Credit union

Washington State Employees Credit Union

Olympia, Washington · $1 billion – $10 billion

59of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureArmed Forces Bank, National AssociationWashington State Employees Credit Union
TellerScore83 (stronger)59
Capital cushion89 (stronger)49
Loan quality6073 (stronger)
Earnings88 (stronger)30
Funding & liquidity98 (stronger)74
Problem-loan coverage91 (stronger)87
Peer percentile94th22nd
Total assets$1.4B$5.1B
Deposits / shares$1.2B$4.5B
Capital ratio13.92% (stronger)9.89%
Problem loans1.21%0.80% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.39% (stronger)1.17%
Return on assets1.70% (stronger)0.25%
Loans ÷ deposits59.3% (stronger)86.2%
Uninsured deposits17.1%13.8% (stronger)
Offices1424
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)20.4%46.1%

Armed Forces Bank, National Association has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 59). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Armed Forces Bank, National Association leads on 5 and Washington State Employees Credit Union on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions