TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Armed Forces Bank, National Association vs Western Alliance Bank

Bank

Armed Forces Bank, National Association

Fort Leavenworth, Kansas · $1 billion – $10 billion

83of 100
Strong

Bank

Western Alliance Bank

Phoenix, Arizona · $10 billion – $100 billion

38of 100
Low

Metric by metric

MeasureArmed Forces Bank, National AssociationWestern Alliance Bank
TellerScore83 (stronger)38
Capital cushion89 (stronger)31
Loan quality60 (stronger)6
Earnings88 (stronger)66
Funding & liquidity98 (stronger)56
Problem-loan coverage91 (stronger)55
Peer percentile94th5th
Total assets$1.4B$98.6B
Deposits / shares$1.2B$82.3B
Capital ratio13.92% (stronger)8.08%
Problem loans1.21% (stronger)2.82%
Net charge-offs0.39% (stronger)0.83%
Return on assets1.70% (stronger)1.16%
Loans ÷ deposits59.3% (stronger)79.1%
Uninsured deposits17.1% (stronger)38.1%
Offices1435
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)—73
Complaints per $1B deposits—0.9
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)20.4%—

Armed Forces Bank, National Association has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 38). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Armed Forces Bank, National Association leads on 7 and Western Alliance Bank on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions