Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Armstrong Bank vs All Capital Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Armstrong Bank | All Capital Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 (stronger) | 73 |
| Capital cushion | 54 (stronger) | 45 |
| Loan quality | 92 (stronger) | 90 |
| Earnings | 75 | 95 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 70 (stronger) | 54 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 94 | 94 |
| Peer percentile | 74th | 53rd |
| Total assets | $2.8B | $176.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $2.6B | $158.4M |
| Capital ratio | 10.42% (stronger) | 9.52% |
| Problem loans | 0.25% (stronger) | 0.30% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.15% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.37% | 1.88% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 79.3% (stronger) | 91.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 24.5% (stronger) | 28.2% |
| Offices | 30 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 9.7% | 0.0% |
Armstrong Bank has the higher TellerScore (74 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Armstrong Bank leads on 5 and All Capital Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.