Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Armstrong Bank vs Bank of Eufaula
Metric by metric
| Measure | Armstrong Bank | Bank of Eufaula |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 (stronger) | 68 |
| Capital cushion | 54 | 71 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 92 (stronger) | 85 |
| Earnings | 75 (stronger) | 19 |
| Funding & liquidity | 70 | 84 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 94 (stronger) | 92 |
| Peer percentile | 74th | 33rd |
| Total assets | $2.8B | $87.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $2.6B | $77.0M |
| Capital ratio | 10.42% | 12.09% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.25% (stronger) | 0.46% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.15% | 0.02% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.37% (stronger) | -0.04% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 79.3% | 29.5% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 24.5% (stronger) | 29.8% |
| Offices | 30 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 9.7% | — |
Armstrong Bank has the higher TellerScore (74 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Armstrong Bank leads on 4 and Bank of Eufaula on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.