TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Armstrong Bank vs Local Bank

Bank

Armstrong Bank

Muskogee, Oklahoma · $1 billion – $10 billion

74of 100
Strong

Bank

Local Bank

Hulbert, Oklahoma · $100 million – $1 billion

66of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureArmstrong BankLocal Bank
TellerScore74 (stronger)66
Capital cushion5464 (stronger)
Loan quality92 (stronger)83
Earnings75 (stronger)34
Funding & liquidity70 (stronger)69
Problem-loan coverage94 (stronger)93
Peer percentile74th31st
Total assets$2.8B$463.1M
Deposits / shares$2.6B$382.6M
Capital ratio10.42%11.35% (stronger)
Problem loans0.25% (stronger)0.52%
Net charge-offs0.15%0.05% (stronger)
Return on assets1.37% (stronger)0.34%
Loans ÷ deposits79.3% (stronger)91.0%
Uninsured deposits24.5%14.4% (stronger)
Offices306
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)9.7%—

Armstrong Bank has the higher TellerScore (74 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Armstrong Bank leads on 4 and Local Bank on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions