Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Audubon State Bank vs Rolling Hills Bank & Trust
Metric by metric
| Measure | Audubon State Bank | Rolling Hills Bank & Trust |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 78 (stronger) | 77 |
| Capital cushion | 55 | 68 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 93 (stronger) | 90 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 78 |
| Funding & liquidity | 54 | 57 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 97 |
| Peer percentile | 72nd | 68th |
| Total assets | $155.3M | $484.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $131.0M | $416.2M |
| Capital ratio | 10.46% | 11.85% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.20% (stronger) | 0.30% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 2.38% (stronger) | 1.45% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 93.0% | 90.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 26.7% | 26.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 12 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 4.3% |
Audubon State Bank has the higher TellerScore (78 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Audubon State Bank leads on 4 and Rolling Hills Bank & Trust on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.