Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Avana Bank vs Texas Financial Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Avana Bank | Texas Financial Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 79 (stronger) | 61 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 67 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 67 |
| Earnings | 3 | 33 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 89 (stronger) | 57 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 92 |
| Peer percentile | 63rd | 20th |
| Total assets | $39.6M | $264.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $30.6M | $223.6M |
| Capital ratio | 17.52% (stronger) | 11.72% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 1.00% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | -0.42% | 0.33% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 46.3% (stronger) | 65.7% |
| Uninsured deposits | 25.4% (stronger) | 48.6% |
| Offices | 2 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Avana Bank has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 61). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Avana Bank leads on 5 and Texas Financial Bank on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.