TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

B-M S Federal Credit Union vs N. J. Latvian Federal Credit Union

Credit union

B-M S Federal Credit Union

New Brunswick, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets

80of 100
Strong

Credit union

N. J. Latvian Federal Credit Union

Freehold, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets

66of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureB-M S Federal Credit UnionN. J. Latvian Federal Credit Union
TellerScore80 (stronger)66
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality82 (stronger)41
Earnings25 (stronger)6
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage9898
Peer percentile65th32nd
Total assets$81.7M$4.7M
Deposits / shares$65.7M$4.1M
Capital ratio21.09% (stronger)16.36%
Problem loans0.54% (stronger)1.76%
Net charge-offs0.27%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets0.13% (stronger)-0.34%
Loans ÷ deposits37.7%8.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits13.2%0.0% (stronger)
Offices41
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

B-M S Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), B-M S Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and N. J. Latvian Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions