TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

B-M S Federal Credit Union vs United Poles Federal Credit Union

Credit union

B-M S Federal Credit Union

New Brunswick, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets

80of 100
Strong

Credit union

United Poles Federal Credit Union

Perth Amboy, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets

28of 100
Low

Metric by metric

MeasureB-M S Federal Credit UnionUnited Poles Federal Credit Union
TellerScore80 (stronger)28
Capital cushion100 (stronger)20
Loan quality82 (stronger)1
Earnings2541 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)69
Problem-loan coverage98 (stronger)28
Peer percentile65th1st
Total assets$81.7M$72.3M
Deposits / shares$65.7M$66.6M
Capital ratio21.09% (stronger)6.95%
Problem loans0.54% (stronger)2.96%
Net charge-offs0.27%0.17% (stronger)
Return on assets0.13%0.53% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits37.7% (stronger)91.0%
Uninsured deposits13.2%7.7% (stronger)
Offices43
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—0.0%

B-M S Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 28). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), B-M S Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and United Poles Federal Credit Union on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions