TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Badlands Federal Credit Union vs Vocal Credit Union

Credit union

Badlands Federal Credit Union

Glendive, Montana · Under $100 million in assets

54of 100
Below average

Credit union

Vocal Credit Union

Helena, Montana · Under $100 million in assets

82of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureBadlands Federal Credit UnionVocal Credit Union
TellerScore5482 (stronger)
Capital cushion3182 (stronger)
Loan quality5287 (stronger)
Earnings4066 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)88
Problem-loan coverage8996 (stronger)
Peer percentile13th70th
Total assets$37.6M$52.6M
Deposits / shares$34.6M$45.2M
Capital ratio8.06%13.19% (stronger)
Problem loans1.45%0.40% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.21%0.19% (stronger)
Return on assets0.49%1.16% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits32.4% (stronger)72.3%
Uninsured deposits8.3%1.4% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Vocal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 54). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Badlands Federal Credit Union leads on 1 and Vocal Credit Union on 6. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions