Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of Crockett vs Elizabethton Federal Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of Crockett | Elizabethton Federal Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 76 | 86 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 55 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 90 | 92 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 80 (stronger) | 66 |
| Funding & liquidity | 73 (stronger) | 66 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 64th | 90th |
| Total assets | $299.1M | $326.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $266.3M | $187.9M |
| Capital ratio | 10.46% | 42.27% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.29% | 0.25% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.49% (stronger) | 1.14% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 76.2% (stronger) | 94.0% |
| Uninsured deposits | 25.2% | 8.3% (stronger) |
| Offices | 4 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 0.0% | — |
Elizabethton Federal Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 76). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Crockett leads on 2 and Elizabethton Federal Savings Bank on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.