Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of the Flint Hills vs New Century Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of the Flint Hills | New Century Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 71 | 79 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 36 | 82 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 99 (stronger) | 71 |
| Earnings | 82 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 59 (stronger) | 52 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 89 |
| Peer percentile | 47th | 63rd |
| Total assets | $544.5M | $88.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $473.0M | $71.6M |
| Capital ratio | 8.65% | 13.16% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.03% (stronger) | 0.87% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% | -0.15% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.56% | 2.20% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 90.2% (stronger) | 108.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 25.5% | 11.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 7 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 6.2% | 0.0% |
New Century Bank has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 71). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of the Flint Hills leads on 2 and New Century Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.