Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of the Sierra vs Kings Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of the Sierra | Kings Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 77 | 86 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 72 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 86 (stronger) | 79 |
| Earnings | 73 (stronger) | 60 |
| Funding & liquidity | 63 | 96 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 (stronger) | 95 |
| Peer percentile | 83rd | 89th |
| Total assets | $3.7B | $162.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $2.9B | $136.4M |
| Capital ratio | 12.25% | 15.97% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.43% (stronger) | 0.64% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% (stronger) | 0.24% |
| Return on assets | 1.33% (stronger) | 0.99% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 82.9% | 64.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 27.9% | 5.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 34 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Kings Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of the Sierra leads on 3 and Kings Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.