Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of Washington vs Royal Banks of Missouri
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of Washington | Royal Banks of Missouri |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 44 | 70 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 75 (stronger) | 59 |
| Loan quality | 0 | 95 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 55 | 62 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 40 | 59 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 42 | 75 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 4th | 58th |
| Total assets | $1.1B | $1.0B |
| Deposits / shares | $887.8M | $891.6M |
| Capital ratio | 12.47% (stronger) | 10.93% |
| Problem loans | 3.50% | 0.16% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.39% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.86% | 1.05% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 113.7% | 90.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 24.0% (stronger) | 25.2% |
| Offices | 7 | 16 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 5.8% | — |
Royal Banks of Missouri has the higher TellerScore (70 vs 44). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Washington leads on 2 and Royal Banks of Missouri on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.