Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of Washington vs The Bank of Houston
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of Washington | The Bank of Houston |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 44 | 82 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 75 | 91 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 0 | 95 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 55 | 63 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 40 | 57 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 42 | 98 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 4th | 70th |
| Total assets | $1.1B | $67.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $887.8M | $51.2M |
| Capital ratio | 12.47% | 14.14% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 3.50% | 0.16% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.39% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.86% | 1.07% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 113.7% | 103.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 24.0% | 7.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 7 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 5.8% | — |
The Bank of Houston has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 44). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Washington leads on 0 and The Bank of Houston on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.