Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank OZK vs Thomasville National Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank OZK | Thomasville National Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 76 | 76 |
| Capital cushion | 90 (stronger) | 57 |
| Loan quality | 69 | 93 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 84 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 46 (stronger) | 37 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 83 | 97 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 91st | 80th |
| Total assets | $41.7B | $2.2B |
| Deposits / shares | $34.0B | $1.9B |
| Capital ratio | 13.96% (stronger) | 10.75% |
| Problem loans | 0.92% | 0.22% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.62% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.60% | 2.40% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 94.4% (stronger) | 97.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 32.5% (stronger) | 38.7% |
| Offices | 255 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 153 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 4.5 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 37.8% | — |
Both have the same TellerScore. On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank OZK leads on 3 and Thomasville National Bank on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.