Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Baxter Credit Union vs Abbott Laboratories Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Baxter Credit Union | Abbott Laboratories Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 60 | 89 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 53 | 95 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 71 | 96 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 49 | 58 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 56 | 98 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 86 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 25th | 97th |
| Total assets | $6.4B | $1.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $5.0B | $981.6M |
| Capital ratio | 10.25% | 14.49% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.86% | 0.11% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 1.06% | 0.16% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.72% | 0.95% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 104.2% | 62.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 14.2% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 33 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 20.2% | — |
Abbott Laboratories Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 60). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Baxter Credit Union leads on 0 and Abbott Laboratories Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.