TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Blue Grass Federal Savings and Loan Association vs Whitaker Bank

Bank

Blue Grass Federal Savings and Loan Association

Paris, Kentucky · Under $100 million in assets

79of 100
Strong

Bank

Whitaker Bank

Lexington, Kentucky · $1 billion – $10 billion

84of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureBlue Grass Federal Savings and Loan AssociationWhitaker Bank
TellerScore7984 (stronger)
Capital cushion100 (stronger)79
Loan quality100 (stronger)93
Earnings3277 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity5080 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)98
Peer percentile63rd95th
Total assets$58.5M$1.9B
Deposits / shares$40.6M$1.6B
Capital ratio15.91% (stronger)12.89%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.21%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.06%
Return on assets0.29%1.42% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits110.0%67.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits10.2% (stronger)26.8%
Offices144
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Whitaker Bank has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 79). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Blue Grass Federal Savings and Loan Association leads on 4 and Whitaker Bank on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions