TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Boeing Employees Credit Union vs Connection Credit Union

Credit union

Boeing Employees Credit Union

Tukwila, Washington · Over $10 billion

75of 100
Strong

Credit union

Connection Credit Union

Silverdale, Washington · Under $100 million in assets

73of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureBoeing Employees Credit UnionConnection Credit Union
TellerScore75 (stronger)73
Capital cushion7680 (stronger)
Loan quality86 (stronger)69
Earnings43 (stronger)37
Funding & liquidity8299 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage95 (stronger)92
Peer percentile75th47th
Total assets$29.6B$40.4M
Deposits / shares$25.9B$34.9M
Capital ratio12.57%13.01% (stronger)
Problem loans0.42% (stronger)0.93%
Net charge-offs0.70%-0.11% (stronger)
Return on assets0.58% (stronger)0.41%
Loans ÷ deposits78.7%60.8% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits8.3%5.1% (stronger)
Offices421
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)554—
Complaints per $1B deposits21.4—
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)26.5%—

Boeing Employees Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (75 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Boeing Employees Credit Union leads on 3 and Connection Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions