Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Brickyard Bank vs Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union
Chicago, Illinois · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Brickyard Bank | Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 84 | 100 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 96 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 74 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 38 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 86th | 100th |
| Total assets | $159.0M | $2.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $123.1M | $1.4M |
| Capital ratio | 15.64% (stronger) | 15.53% |
| Problem loans | 0.13% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 1.35% | 3.21% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 96.1% | 35.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 39.0% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 2 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (100 vs 84). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Brickyard Bank leads on 1 and Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.