Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bruning Bank vs Arbor Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bruning Bank | Arbor Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 (stronger) | 57 |
| Capital cushion | 50 (stronger) | 37 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 66 |
| Earnings | 69 (stronger) | 67 |
| Funding & liquidity | 66 (stronger) | 51 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 82 |
| Peer percentile | 57th | 14th |
| Total assets | $659.9M | $701.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $560.4M | $607.8M |
| Capital ratio | 10.01% (stronger) | 8.69% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 1.03% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.01% |
| Return on assets | 1.23% (stronger) | 1.16% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 87.0% (stronger) | 97.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 21.2% (stronger) | 25.7% |
| Offices | 6 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 14.1% | 0.9% |
Bruning Bank has the higher TellerScore (74 vs 57). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bruning Bank leads on 7 and Arbor Bank on 0. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.