TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

California International Bank, N.A. vs I.L.W.U. Federal Credit Union

Bank

California International Bank, N.A.

Westminster, California · $100 million – $1 billion

89of 100
Very strong

Credit union

I.L.W.U. Federal Credit Union

Long Beach, California · $100 million – $1 billion

67of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureCalifornia International Bank, N.A.I.L.W.U. Federal Credit Union
TellerScore89 (stronger)67
Capital cushion85 (stronger)49
Loan quality100 (stronger)70
Earnings89 (stronger)67
Funding & liquidity7085 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)88
Peer percentile94th41st
Total assets$120.9M$607.5M
Deposits / shares$105.9M$550.2M
Capital ratio13.51% (stronger)9.94%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.89%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.30%
Return on assets1.71% (stronger)1.16%
Loans ÷ deposits76.7%74.1% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits27.3%16.5% (stronger)
Offices16
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

California International Bank, N.A. has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), California International Bank, N.A. leads on 5 and I.L.W.U. Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions