Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
California International Bank, N.A. vs US Metro Bank
Bank
California International Bank, N.A.
Westminster, California · $100 million – $1 billion
Metric by metric
| Measure | California International Bank, N.A. | US Metro Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 89 (stronger) | 52 |
| Capital cushion | 85 (stronger) | 54 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 49 |
| Earnings | 89 (stronger) | 60 |
| Funding & liquidity | 70 (stronger) | 30 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 73 |
| Peer percentile | 94th | 9th |
| Total assets | $120.9M | $1.6B |
| Deposits / shares | $105.9M | $1.4B |
| Capital ratio | 13.51% (stronger) | 10.42% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 1.54% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.38% |
| Return on assets | 1.71% (stronger) | 1.01% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 76.7% (stronger) | 94.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 27.3% (stronger) | 47.7% |
| Offices | 1 | 9 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
California International Bank, N.A. has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 52). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), California International Bank, N.A. leads on 7 and US Metro Bank on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.