TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Cambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union vs M.O.S.E.S. Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Cambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union

Cambridge, Massachusetts · Under $100 million in assets

97of 100
Very strong

Credit union

M.O.S.E.S. Federal Credit Union

Boston, Massachusetts · Under $100 million in assets

81of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureCambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit UnionM.O.S.E.S. Federal Credit Union
TellerScore97 (stronger)81
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality96100 (stronger)
Earnings88 (stronger)6
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage100100
Peer percentile98th68th
Total assets$10.2M$1.5M
Deposits / shares$7.7M$1.2M
Capital ratio24.81% (stronger)21.94%
Problem loans0.12%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.00%0.00%
Return on assets1.71% (stronger)-0.34%
Loans ÷ deposits40.7%31.0% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.0%0.0%
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Cambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (97 vs 81). On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and M.O.S.E.S. Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions