Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Cedar Valley Bank & Trust vs Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company
Metric by metric
| Measure | Cedar Valley Bank & Trust | Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 54 | 87 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 40 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 58 | 82 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 76 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 34 | 43 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 68 | 96 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 10th | 98th |
| Total assets | $126.3M | $2.9B |
| Deposits / shares | $114.5M | $2.1B |
| Capital ratio | 9.01% | 16.94% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.27% | 0.54% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.07% (stronger) | 0.23% |
| Return on assets | 1.40% | 2.72% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 98.0% | 95.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 40.4% | 34.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 2 | 9 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 3.2% | 5.9% |
Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 54). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cedar Valley Bank & Trust leads on 1 and Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.