TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Central Federal Savings and Loan Association vs Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union

Bank

Central Federal Savings and Loan Association

Cicero, Illinois · $100 million – $1 billion

61of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union

Chicago, Illinois · Under $100 million in assets

100of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureCentral Federal Savings and Loan AssociationIsrael Methcomm Federal Credit Union
TellerScore61100 (stronger)
Capital cushion53100 (stronger)
Loan quality78100 (stronger)
Earnings22100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity81100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage91100 (stronger)
Peer percentile20th100th
Total assets$194.6M$2.0M
Deposits / shares$171.6M$1.4M
Capital ratio10.32%15.53% (stronger)
Problem loans0.65%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs-0.01% (stronger)0.00%
Return on assets0.06%3.21% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits79.7%35.8% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits11.7%0.0% (stronger)
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (100 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Central Federal Savings and Loan Association leads on 1 and Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions