Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Chambers Bank vs Usem Mena Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Chambers Bank | Usem Mena Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 81 | 89 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 76 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 92 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 91 (stronger) | 83 |
| Funding & liquidity | 46 | 52 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 91st | 87th |
| Total assets | $1.6B | $1.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.3B | $1.2M |
| Capital ratio | 12.57% | 32.39% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.23% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% | -0.19% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.76% (stronger) | 1.59% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 86.7% (stronger) | 108.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 40.2% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 24 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 11.0% | — |
Usem Mena Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 81). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Chambers Bank leads on 2 and Usem Mena Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Mena, AR