TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Chelsea Groton Bank vs Manchester Municipal Federal Credit Union

Bank

Chelsea Groton Bank

Groton, Connecticut · $1 billion – $10 billion

82of 100
Strong

Credit union

Manchester Municipal Federal Credit Union

Manchester, Connecticut · Under $100 million in assets

62of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureChelsea Groton BankManchester Municipal Federal Credit Union
TellerScore82 (stronger)62
Capital cushion100 (stronger)42
Loan quality84 (stronger)67
Earnings76 (stronger)50
Funding & liquidity4291 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage96 (stronger)87
Peer percentile93rd24th
Total assets$1.8B$40.1M
Deposits / shares$1.2B$36.3M
Capital ratio16.73% (stronger)9.21%
Problem loans0.48% (stronger)0.99%
Net charge-offs-0.00% (stronger)0.02%
Return on assets1.39% (stronger)0.75%
Loans ÷ deposits110.4%69.6% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits22.4%6.6% (stronger)
Offices131
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)11.2%—

Chelsea Groton Bank has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Chelsea Groton Bank leads on 5 and Manchester Municipal Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions