TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Chemung Canal Trust Company, National Association vs Maple City Savings Bank, FSB

Bank

Chemung Canal Trust Company, National Association

Elmira, New York · $1 billion – $10 billion

72of 100
Strong

Bank

Maple City Savings Bank, FSB

Hornell, New York · $100 million – $1 billion

55of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureChemung Canal Trust Company, National AssociationMaple City Savings Bank, FSB
TellerScore72 (stronger)55
Capital cushion64 (stronger)45
Loan quality87 (stronger)52
Earnings76 (stronger)46
Funding & liquidity4379 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage93 (stronger)78
Peer percentile66th11th
Total assets$2.8B$121.8M
Deposits / shares$2.4B$108.4M
Capital ratio11.38% (stronger)9.46%
Problem loans0.38% (stronger)1.44%
Net charge-offs0.01% (stronger)0.07%
Return on assets1.40% (stronger)0.65%
Loans ÷ deposits98.9%81.6% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits31.4%6.0% (stronger)
Offices302
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)15.1%—

Chemung Canal Trust Company, National Association has the higher TellerScore (72 vs 55). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Chemung Canal Trust Company, National Association leads on 5 and Maple City Savings Bank, FSB on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions