TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Christiansted Federal Credit Union vs Phi Beta Sigma Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Christiansted Federal Credit Union

Christiansted, U.S. Virgin Islands · Under $100 million in assets

98of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Phi Beta Sigma Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets

49of 100
Below average

Metric by metric

MeasureChristiansted Federal Credit UnionPhi Beta Sigma Federal Credit Union
TellerScore98 (stronger)49
Capital cushion100 (stronger)51
Loan quality92 (stronger)0
Earnings98 (stronger)94
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)0
Peer percentile98th8th
Total assets$34.0M$991K
Deposits / shares$26.9M$895K
Capital ratio20.63% (stronger)10.06%
Problem loans0.23% (stronger)13.69%
Net charge-offs0.22% (stronger)5.75%
Return on assets1.96% (stronger)1.84%
Loans ÷ deposits45.3% (stronger)50.6%
Uninsured deposits1.0%0.0% (stronger)
Offices33
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Christiansted Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 49). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Christiansted Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Phi Beta Sigma Federal Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions