Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Citizens Savings Bank vs Hills Bank and Trust Company
Metric by metric
| Measure | Citizens Savings Bank | Hills Bank and Trust Company |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 | 84 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 45 | 84 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 87 |
| Earnings | 61 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 86 (stronger) | 48 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 96 |
| Peer percentile | 57th | 95th |
| Total assets | $165.9M | $4.8B |
| Deposits / shares | $151.3M | $3.5B |
| Capital ratio | 9.50% | 13.36% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.40% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.01% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 1.02% | 2.08% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 45.4% (stronger) | 102.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 27.7% | 23.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 2 | 19 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 6.6% |
Hills Bank and Trust Company has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Citizens Savings Bank leads on 3 and Hills Bank and Trust Company on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.