TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Clinton Bank vs Blue Grass Federal Savings and Loan Association

Bank

Clinton Bank

Clinton, Kentucky · Under $100 million in assets

69of 100
Moderate

Bank

Blue Grass Federal Savings and Loan Association

Paris, Kentucky · Under $100 million in assets

79of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureClinton BankBlue Grass Federal Savings and Loan Association
TellerScore6979 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality41100 (stronger)
Earnings49 (stronger)32
Funding & liquidity70 (stronger)50
Problem-loan coverage84100 (stronger)
Peer percentile37th63rd
Total assets$70.4M$58.5M
Deposits / shares$59.2M$40.6M
Capital ratio16.82% (stronger)15.91%
Problem loans1.77%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.04%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets0.73% (stronger)0.29%
Loans ÷ deposits86.9% (stronger)110.0%
Uninsured deposits18.4%10.2% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Blue Grass Federal Savings and Loan Association has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 69). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Clinton Bank leads on 3 and Blue Grass Federal Savings and Loan Association on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions