TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Clinton Savings Bank vs Cambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union

Bank

Clinton Savings Bank

Clinton, Massachusetts · $100 million – $1 billion

58of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Cambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union

Cambridge, Massachusetts · Under $100 million in assets

97of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureClinton Savings BankCambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore5897 (stronger)
Capital cushion47100 (stronger)
Loan quality8396 (stronger)
Earnings3488 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity61100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage72100 (stronger)
Peer percentile16th98th
Total assets$744.7M$10.2M
Deposits / shares$581.6M$7.7M
Capital ratio9.65%24.81% (stronger)
Problem loans0.50%0.12% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.66%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets0.35%1.71% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits88.1%40.7% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits25.0%0.0% (stronger)
Offices83
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)11.4%—

Cambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (97 vs 58). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Clinton Savings Bank leads on 0 and Cambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions