Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Cogent Bank vs Gala Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Cogent Bank | Gala Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 72 | 73 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 47 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 87 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 0 |
| Funding & liquidity | 43 | 51 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 95 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 66th | 48th |
| Total assets | $2.5B | $44.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $2.2B | $35.5M |
| Capital ratio | 9.72% | 22.07% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.39% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.09% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 2.22% (stronger) | -1.98% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 82.5% | 62.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 46.3% (stronger) | 57.1% |
| Offices | 11 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 8.6% | — |
Gala Bank has the higher TellerScore (73 vs 72). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cogent Bank leads on 2 and Gala Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.