Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Columbia Bank vs Redwood Capital Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Columbia Bank | Redwood Capital Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 64 | 76 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 47 | 60 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 81 | 96 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 70 (stronger) | 67 |
| Funding & liquidity | 44 | 72 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 93 | 97 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 46th | 64th |
| Total assets | $65.4B | $566.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $52.2B | $504.9M |
| Capital ratio | 9.68% | 10.96% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.57% | 0.13% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.28% | -0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.25% (stronger) | 1.16% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 89.6% | 78.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 39.5% | 24.1% (stronger) |
| Offices | 349 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 228 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 4.4 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 28.5% | — |
Redwood Capital Bank has the higher TellerScore (76 vs 64). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Columbia Bank leads on 1 and Redwood Capital Bank on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Eureka, CA
- Arcata, CA
- Fortuna, CA