Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Concordia Bank & Trust Company vs United Mississippi Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Concordia Bank & Trust Company | United Mississippi Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 52 | 75 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 61 (stronger) | 60 |
| Loan quality | 15 | 94 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 65 | 66 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 74 (stronger) | 71 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 59 | 98 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 8th | 61st |
| Total assets | $667.0M | $560.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $585.7M | $478.9M |
| Capital ratio | 11.12% (stronger) | 11.04% |
| Problem loans | 2.54% | 0.19% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% (stronger) | 0.05% |
| Return on assets | 1.13% | 1.15% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 60.9% (stronger) | 85.7% |
| Uninsured deposits | 37.3% | 18.6% (stronger) |
| Offices | 8 | 13 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 13.6% | — |
United Mississippi Bank has the higher TellerScore (75 vs 52). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Concordia Bank & Trust Company leads on 3 and United Mississippi Bank on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Natchez, MS
- Vidalia, LA
- Woodville, MS