Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Connect Community Bank vs Timberland Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Connect Community Bank | Timberland Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 45 | 78 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 0 | 79 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 95 (stronger) | 81 |
| Earnings | 0 | 79 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 77 (stronger) | 62 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 95 (stronger) | 94 |
| Peer percentile | 6th | 86th |
| Total assets | $72.7M | $2.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $69.7M | $1.8B |
| Capital ratio | 3.61% | 12.85% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.15% (stronger) | 0.56% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.30% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | -1.73% | 1.47% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 82.8% (stronger) | 84.9% |
| Uninsured deposits | 3.3% (stronger) | 26.8% |
| Offices | 2 | 24 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 17.0% |
Timberland Bank has the higher TellerScore (78 vs 45). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Connect Community Bank leads on 3 and Timberland Bank on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.