TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union vs Federal Employees Credit Union

Credit union

Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union

Childersburg, Alabama · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Federal Employees Credit Union

Birmingham, Alabama · Under $100 million in assets

70of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureCoosa Pines Federal Credit UnionFederal Employees Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)70
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality71 (stronger)44
Earnings91 (stronger)26
Funding & liquidity88100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage93 (stronger)89
Peer percentile92nd40th
Total assets$420.8M$19.7M
Deposits / shares$356.6M$16.3M
Capital ratio16.20%16.62% (stronger)
Problem loans0.87% (stronger)1.67%
Net charge-offs0.70% (stronger)0.92%
Return on assets1.77% (stronger)0.15%
Loans ÷ deposits72.3%59.2% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits7.3%0.9% (stronger)
Offices41
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)5.1%—

Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 70). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Federal Employees Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions