TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union vs Health Credit Union

Credit union

Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union

Childersburg, Alabama · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Health Credit Union

Birmingham, Alabama · Under $100 million in assets

65of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureCoosa Pines Federal Credit UnionHealth Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)65
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality71 (stronger)43
Earnings91 (stronger)25
Funding & liquidity88 (stronger)67
Problem-loan coverage93 (stronger)89
Peer percentile92nd30th
Total assets$420.8M$27.6M
Deposits / shares$356.6M$21.1M
Capital ratio16.20%22.33% (stronger)
Problem loans0.87% (stronger)1.72%
Net charge-offs0.70% (stronger)2.04%
Return on assets1.77% (stronger)0.13%
Loans ÷ deposits72.3% (stronger)93.7%
Uninsured deposits7.3%2.9% (stronger)
Offices41
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)5.1%—

Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 65). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Health Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions